Welcome to the new CCMC website!

Please note that some pages may have moved during the migration. If you experience any issues with the new website, please reach out to gsfc-ccmc-support@lists.hq.nasa.gov.

Last Updated: 04/29/2022

SEP Validation Team


Team Leads: K. Whitman, P. Quinn, H. Bain, I.G. Richardson, M.L. Mays
Scoreboard Leads: M. Dierckxsens, M.L. Mays

See the ISWAT team page for an up to date list of participants.

Latest News

➡ COSPAR ISWAT: This team is now also a COSPAR ISWAT Team: https://www.iswat-cospar.org/h3-01
➡ Current SHINE 2020-2021 and ESWW SEP Modeling Challenge: the team is soliciting model outputs, see the challenge website for more details
➡ SHINE 2019 SEP Modeling Challenge (Research to Operations): session summary and analysis of submitted results
➡ SHINE and ESWW 2018 community campaign: session presentations and summary
➡ April 2017 working meeting: team agenda [PDF] | solar/heliosphere agenda [PDF] | full agenda

User Needs

What are the requirements of different users, e.g. satellite operators, aviation and ground-based services?

  • What can or should be forecast? Current models mostly focus on predicting the GOES >10 MeV proton flux but certain users may be interested in higher energies or heavier ions.
  • Probabilistic forecasts for 24 hour intervals 1-3 days ahead.
  • Estimation of SEP effects in retrospective sense are needed for aviation.
  • Models that are advanced enough for actionable forecasts.

Working Team Goals

  • Evaluate how well different models/techniques can predict historical SEP events throughout the heliosphere.
  • Establish metrics agreed upon by the community
  • Provide a benchmark against which future models can be assessed against
  • Complementary to the SEP Scoreboard activity whose goal is collect and display real-time SEP predictions and ultimately facilitate validation.

Potential Questions to Address

Where do we stand with SEP prediction?

  • Using case studies of selected events, can we assess where we stand with SEP prediction?
  • How well can the success of SEP models be compared? Is it possible to identify a uniform metric?
  • How do we move beyond using case studies for model/data comparisons?

List of Time Intervals in this Study — under discussion

  • Proposed: October 2011 – June 2012
  • Consider a training set, validation set, and test set. The test set would not be revealed until a later stage and model parameter tweaking would not be allowed.
  • Time period should have some overlap with Radiation & Plasma Effects working teams: SEEsTotal DoseRadiation effects for aviation.
  • Time period should include STEREO (to have good CME and SEP observations).
  • Initially Focus on SEP events at Earth, later expand to multi-spacecraft even periods
  • Have a mix of events: ones that cross certain thresholds, and ones that do not.
  • What energy range should be used to select events?

Resources, Presentations, and Past Progress