Welcome to the new CCMC website!

Please note that some pages may have moved during the migration. If you experience any issues with the new website, please reach out to gsfc-ccmc-support@lists.hq.nasa.gov.

Last Updated: 04/06/2022

GEM Mid-Tail Modeling

The CCMC has begun work on a modeling challenge to assess global MHD models' capability to predict large-scale and meso-scale dynamics of the mid-tail at 60 RE in response to the solar wind/IMF changes. Background information and presentations from the mid-tail modeling challenge session at the 2016 GEM Summer Workshop are available.


From the Tail Environment and Dynamics at Lunar Distances Focus Group

We are organizing a modeling challenge to investigate the ability of global models (both MHD and hybrid models) to reproduce the large-scale and meso-scale structures dynamics of the mid-tail (X ~ -60 RE) observed by ARTEMIS. For this challenge we selected an event with prolonged (48 hours) northward IMF interval from 13-14 February 2014, during which the two ARTEMIS probes (separation of ~1-3 RE) were at XGSE = -60 RE moving from YGSE = 23 to 3 RE and are close to the current sheet. The objective is to address the following questions:

  1. How does the mid-tail configuration response to changes in IMF By and solar wind dynamic pressure?
  2. What processes cause the 10 to 30 min perturbations in the mid-tail plasma sheet?
  3. What are characteristics of plasma flows in mid-tail plasma sheet?

Presentation on this challenge

Chih-Ping Wang' s Event overview [PDF]

Publications about mid-tail observation and modeling

  • Sibeck et al. (2014), Size and shape of the distant magnetotail, J. Geophys Res. Space Physics, 119, 1028-1043, doi:10.1002/2013JA019471.
  • Wang et al. (2014), Properties of low-latitude mantle plasma in the Earth' s magnetotail: ARTEMIS observations and global MHD predictions, J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 119, doi:10.1002/2014JA020060.
  • Wang et al. (2015), Dawn-dusk asymmetry in bursty hot electron enhancements in the midtail magnetosheath, J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 120, doi:10.1002/2015JA021522.

Simulation runs at CCMC

Planned Higher-resolution simulation runs by modelers

  • LFM (Slava Merkin)
  • OpenGGCM (Joseph Jensen)
  • GUMICS (Ilja Honkonen)
  • Auburn University global hybrid code (Yu Lin, Xueyi Wang)

Please send questions, comments and suggestions to Chih-Ping Wang. and Lutz Rastaetter.