International Forum for Space Weather Capabilities Assessment

Forum Home | Working Teams & Topics |  Overall Goals and Deliverables  | Sign Up | FAQ |  ICCMC-LWS Working Meeting & Presentations 
Solar Indices

Related Links | Frequently Asked Questions | Community Feedback | Downloads | Sitemap
CCMC Home | CCMC Stakeholders | Our Team | Publications | Meetings and Workshops | Concept of Operations
Models At A Glance | ModelWeb Catalog and Archive
Request Procedures | Generate Input Data Files & Parameters | Movies on Request | About the Run Process | Publications Policy
Search run database | Request run output | Special events | Kameleon Software | Space Weather Explorer | Publications policy
Instant Model Run
Forecasting Support tools | iSWA | DONKI | Mission Support | Experimental Real Time Simulations | Operational Geospace Model Validations
Intl Forum | GEM Challenge | CEDAR ETI Challenge | GEM-CEDAR Challenge | SHINE Challenge | CME Arrival Time Scoreboard | Flare Scoreboard | SEP Scoreboard | IMF Bz Scoreboard
Educational materials &activities | Space Weather REDI Initiative | SW REDI Bootcamp | Student Research Contest | Tutorial at CEDAR | Forecaster Tools
Missions near Earth/in Earth-orbit | MMS | Van Allen Probes | THEMIS | MESSENGER | STEREO | Spitzer | MAVEN | MSL | Dawn | Kepler | EPOXI | Juno | CASSINI | Voyager | New Horizons | Sounding Rockets | International
Research Community Support | CCMC Workshops | NASA Robotic Mission Operator Workshops | LWS Support | Exo-CCMC | DREAM2 Support | HELCATS Support
iSWA | DONKI | Kameleon | StereoCat | EEGGL | CME Scoreboard | SEP Scoreboard | FLR Scoreboard | SEA5

Solar Indices and Irradiance Working Team

Solar indices (e.g. F10.7, MgII core-to-wing ratio, total magnetic flux)

Team Leads: C. Henney, J. Klenzing, K. Muglach
List of participants: C. Henney (AFRL), J. Klenzing (NASA/GSFC), K. Muglach* (NASA/GSFC), J-S. Shim* (CCMC), S. Bruinsma* (CNES), T. Fuller-Rowell* (NOAA), N. Arge (NASA/GSFC), D. Bilitza (NASA/GSFC), J. Fontenla (NWRA), A. Mannucci* (JPL), K. Tobiska* (SET), H. Warren (NRL), R. Hock-Mysliwiec (ARFL/RVBXS), A. Vourlidas (JHU APL), S. Brown* (GMU), L. Lefevre* (ROB), K. Winters* (45th Weather Squadron), L. Mays* (CCMC), P. Riley (PSI), R. Steenburgh* (NOAA), M. Georgoulis* (RCAAM), D. Matthiae* (DLR), C. Wang* (University of Southern California), M. Snow* (LASP), F. Eparvier* (LASP), E. Thiemann* (LASP), T. Woods (LASP), R. Viereck (NOAA), A. Kosovichev* (NJIT), I. Kitiashvili* (NASA Ames Research Center), J. Lee (UBC/JCET)
*attending CCMC-LWS working meeting
Communications: (mailing list)

User Needs

Solar XUV (0.1-10 nm), EUV (10-120 nm), and FUV (120-200 nm) radiation is absorbed in the Earth's upper atmosphere, driving ionization and heating of the neutral atmosphere. Current Ionosphere-Thermosphere (IT) models are capable of using measured VUV (0 to 200 nm) spectral information to drive the models, as well as modeled EUV spectra based on solar indices (e.g. F10.7, the solar radio flux at 10.7 cm, along with Mg II core-to-wing ratio, total magnetic flux) used as a proxy for EUV activity.

Day-to-day variability: Many of these solar indices are averaged over long periods of time (81 days to 1 year). When compared with EUV spectral lines (such as the He II 30.4 nm line) over a solar rotation cycle, indices such as F10.7 may peak several days before the EUV peak or several days after, depending on the propagation path through the solar atmosphere. The questions for the group are: 1) How well do solar indices reproduce the observed variability of radiation bands within the VUV that drive the IT models on a cadence of 24 hours? 2) Are there other proxies or direct measurements we should use? 3) How do we develop solar spectral irradiance models for input to IT models?

Long-term variability: During the minimum between solar cycles 23 and 24 the ionosphere and thermosphere were unusually contracted. This has been frequently attributed to EUV radiation decreasing more than usual during the minimum whilst traditional solar proxies remained consistent. Additionally, F10.7 is typically capped at values of 200 sfu in IT models. So another one of the questions for the group is: Are other proxies such as MgII c-w better to represent solar EUV long-term variability?

The questions for the group are: 1) How accurate are these indices that drive the models relative to the ionizing radiation on these shorter time scales, and 2) Are there other proxies or direct measurements we should use?

Working Team Goals

  • Identify the current and future input needs of IT models.
  • Identify the effectiveness of available solar proxies (F10.7, MgII c-w, total magnetic field strength) in reproducing the variability of bands within the observed VUV spectrum (0-200 nm) on timescales appropriate to measure the 27-day solar rotation cycle, as well as in terms of overall long-term (11-year) variability.
  • Agree on long-term datasets of EUV that could be used to calibrate and validate these indices on these daily timescales, as well as IT data to validate the response.

Working Team Deliverables

Physical Quantities and Metrics for Model Validation

  • F10.7
  • MgII core-to-wing ratio
  • total magnetic flux
  • others?

Observed Solar Data Sources:

  • 10.7cm solar radio flux (F10.7): National Research Council of Canada, K. Tapping, Publication with description of data, data since 2004
  • MgII core-to-wing ratio (Mg II index)
  • total magnetic flux

Participating Models

List of Time Intervals in this Study

<< Return to the forum homepage

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Office of Scientific Research Air Force Research Laboratory Air Force Weather Agency NOAA Space Environment Center National Science Foundation Office of Naval Research

| | Privacy, Security Notices | CCMC DATA Collection Consent Agreement

CCMC logo designed by artist Nana Bagdavadze