** NOTE: Times are relative to start of Zoom session, in this case around 8am before a 9am meeting start time. 00:54:38 Angelos Vourlidas: to the 1st session speakers: I’ll be chairing the session and will be advancing your slides, Please call the next slide when ready. see you all virtually in 10 mins 00:55:30 Anna Belehaki: Thank you Angelos! 00:57:20 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): Angelos and Stefaan, you can unmute if you'd like to test your audio/video. 00:58:34 Nick Gross: Good Morning! 01:00:59 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): Good morning, everyone! And welcome to the final day of the 2022 CCMC Workshop! 01:01:06 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): In order to avoid open mics or unnecessary background noise, we are muting participants when they join the meeting. 01:01:26 Nick Gross: 👍 01:01:27 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): Please remain muted and refrain from sharing your video to conserve bandwidth unless you're presenting or asking a question. 01:01:37 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): During the Q&A sessions, please raise your hand if you have a question. When called upon, the host will invite you to unmute and, optionally, share your video. 01:02:46 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): If you have any questions or concerns, feel free reach out to me! I hope everyone enjoys the rest of the workshop! 01:31:23 Laura RODRIGUEZ: @Christine: there is a nice new tool for fitting CME using GCS: https://github.com/AthKouloumvakos/PyThea 01:34:11 Christine Verbeke: Thank you Laura, I will look into it! 01:34:35 Laura RODRIGUEZ: Your welcome! 01:36:12 Angelos Vourlidas: Christine, let's find a time to discuss the GCS and generally CME fitting approaches that float around. We should be able to get something more efficient out. we should get a new ISWAT subgroup on this 01:41:38 Bernard Jackson: Stephan, What in-situ observations do you attempt to match with EUHFORIA? In recent history the last months the various monitors at NASA all give different results, especially in density we run our modeling compared with ACE, CELIAS and DSCOVR in real time, with DSCOVR giving the most different values. 01:48:17 Christine Verbeke: Angelos, I agree. I am definitely interested in joining such a subgroup. 01:50:13 Stefaan Poedts: @Bernie: We try to match ACE and DSCOVR data but also data form missions, like PSP 02:19:57 Bernard Jackson: @Stefaan: Thanks, I have found CELIAS probably best, but not accessed in real time well (except for the IPS, which provides real time forecasts, where the current analyses are not really necessary). 02:34:55 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): The workshop is taking a coffee break and will reconvene at 11:00 am EST. 02:38:50 Bernard Jackson: @Suzy: Most interested in your Python analysis for ENLIL. We currently provide ENLIL boundaries from the IPS in IDL, but expect Siegfried has this already using Python. In this way he does not need to input our density and velocity boundaries from the Web in near real time when he uses this as a backup system. Comments? 03:04:10 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): Welcome back, everyone! We'll begin again shortly! 03:06:05 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): As a reminder, in order to avoid open mics or unnecessary background noise, we are muting participants when they join the meeting. Please remain muted and refrain from sharing your video to conserve bandwidth unless you're presenting or asking a question. During the Q&A sessions, please raise your hand if you have a question and wait to be recognized by the session chair. 03:42:32 KD Leka: There has been a lot of development by many institutions to work with SDO data via the infrastructure set up through JSOC including the DRMS/SUMS system (directly or remotely). As the SDO data are transitioned to their archive repository, will those tools be deprecated? Or supported still? 03:49:02 KD Leka: yes. 03:50:05 KD Leka: sorry, audio not working well for me. Thx! 03:59:06 Chris Pankratz: No problem. Thanks for the great question, KD. 04:05:05 Tae Kim: My colleagues and I have noticed some significant changes in the historical OMNI plasma data, particularly in density and temperature, while comparing old data files downloaded several years ago with more recently downloaded data. How often do such changes occur and what are the reasons? Do they announce or document such changes anywhere? 04:07:36 Bobby Candey: Changes to OMNIweb are in its News pages https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/hw_news.html 04:10:13 Bobby Candey: and detailed info on teh processing https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/omni_min_data.html and sources https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/omni_source.html 04:13:51 Tae Kim: Thanks for the links. It does explain that STEREO hourly MAG data were reprocessed in March 2020, but I still did not see anything about OMNI, except for routine period updates 04:35:58 Lan Jian: Tae, the change of OMNI data might be caused by the change of Wind plasma data, if I remember correctly. It used to be WI_K0_SWE, and Natasha changed to use WI_H1_SWE 04:37:03 Lan Jian: Tae, we have contacted Natasha and will forwarded you more info 04:37:23 Tae Kim: Great, thanks! 04:38:08 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): The workshop is headed to lunch. It will reconvene at 1:30 pm EST. 05:33:27 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): Welcome back, everyone! We'll be starting backup shortly. The final session of the workshop will cover “Updates and Feedback on CCMC Services” 05:42:47 Bobby Candey: Regarding OMNIweb changes, Natasha reports that the changes In the high res OMNI (HRO) could also be swapping data from Wind and ACE as better delayed data becomes available https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/omni_min_data.html#ap6 . ACE level 2 plasma data started reprocessing 1-2 years ago for 2013-onwards, which triggered reprocessing HRO data. The low res data starts with Wind SWE KP https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/ftpbrowser/wind_swe_kp.html and gets updated when Wind SWE definitive data become available https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/ftpbrowser/wind_swe_2m.html . For historic data, we changed priority from ACE to Wind, and added Geotail data, etc. in 2013. Natasha recommends using the latest as most correct as described at https://omniweb-dev.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/omni_min_data.html for HRO and https://omniweb-dev.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/ow_data.html for LRO. The data are marked as to the source for each time point, see the list of spacecraft identifiers on those pages. 06:27:25 Corey Bettenhausen (CCMC) (he/him): Any questions or comments, please feel free to raise your hand! 06:30:23 Joycelyn Jones: You might be able to use the MATLAB Compiler Runtime (MCR), which does not require a license in containers. 06:43:04 Nick Gross: I would like to respond to Masha 06:44:07 Nick Gross: Predefined runs can be useful for education. 06:48:20 Nick Gross: Masha, “We love all our children.” 😄 06:52:30 Nick Gross: I wonder if the users should define the exemplier runs? 06:52:53 Nick Gross: I think the mic is off again 07:34:08 Tyler Schiewe (CCMC): That wraps up the workshop. Thanks so much for joining us! Take care everyone.